How does Calvin Klein represent females in the above advert? Are they objectified or sexually empowered?
Firstly one could argue that Eva is shown as being empowered by Calvin Klein and there are a number of reasons which support this.
Firstly, if we focus on her legs you can see that she is standing in a powerful stance; legs apart and her hands on her hips this is often adopted by people who are angry or in charge of a situation, she would seem to be giving it “attitude” as the colloquial kids say, this still certainly empowers her. Next I’m going to draw attention to the camera angle used to photograph her. It can be seen that it is a low angle photograph, giving her more height and a greater sense of power. She looks taller than she would and this is aided by the fact she is wearing high heels shoes. This gives us the impression that she is a strong, powerful person. Lastly I’m going to say that the use of her eyes is clever. The way Calvin Klein has made her close her eyes, emphasizes her underwear thus giving her control because everybody else is stuck staring at her.
However, you could argue that Calvin Klein were certainly trying to objectify her, there is enough evidence to suggest this is correct.
Starting with her face, always a good place to start, you can see that she has damp hair. This suggests that she has just come out the shower and the head flick with the clenched teeth suggest a certain sexual nature to the photograph such as her sex face or orgasm face. Moving down I can comment on the slyness of Calvin Klein. By giving her a more “masculine” bra the viewers attention is drawn to her legs and groin area, which has more being revealed than her top half. I’ve already mentioned how her manly stance is empowering but the fact that she isn’t wearing a wedding ring isn’t. This doesn’t give people the impression “I’m in” it gives the idea that she is going to be dating and that she isn’t married. Most people think that those who are dating have more sex than those who are married. Whether this is true or not I don’t know but the impression is important. Obviously what she is wearing is important in objectifying her. Her suspenders are very important in this, they add a kinky element to the photograph and they are generally associated with “sexiness.” Even her feet are objectified by the use of high heels; they make her legs look more attractive and make her look taller. This aspect works both ways, for empowering and also on the side of objectifying. Lastly, I’m going to refer back to the idea of her having just got out of the shower. This suggests she has been getting washed to go out and the fact she dresses like that suggests she is going out “pulling” bringing back the idea of sex. Also, Calvin Klein seems to have oiled her to make her more attractive to the opposite sex.
When all these points are put together I think that it can be seen that there is overwhelming evidence of this being made for the males in society and that Calvin Klein are objectifying her.